Hello GROMACS users, In the OPLS atomtypes.atp file, is it problematic to define atom type names (e.g., "opls_XXX") with nonconsecutive integers? For example,
opls_1000 ... opls_1100 ... opls_1050 ... Best, Eric -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
