thanks a lot for your comments.
These two peptides are isomers.
I want to know which conformations is more favourable than the other
from the aspect of potential energy.....
However, the system potential energy and the peptide potential energy
seems to be inconsistent with each other.... So I am pretty confused
On 01/13/2017 12:16 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
Having low potential energy (whether in dynamical simulation or em) and
being (any kind of) stable are nearly unrelated concepts. There may be a
way to measure what you want, but so far I suspect you haven't worked out a
good way to describe what you want.
Further, unless your peptides are isomers, your potential energies are of
systems with different composition, so can't be compared.
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.