Dear Mr.Mark Abraham, Thank you for your help. Because of the accuracy of the results, I should use a reasonable cut offs for the interactions around 2.0 nm. The cut offs less than 1.0 nm are too small for my project because of the importance of long range interactions. The box size is an obstacle to determining the desired cut off for interactions.
Best regards On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Iman Ahmadabadi < imanahmadabad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Mr.Mark Abraham, > > Thank you for your help. > Because of the accuracy of the results, I should use a reasonable cut offs > for the interactions around 2.0 nm. The cut offs less than 1.0 nm are too > small for my project because of the importance of long range interactions. > The box size is an obstacle to determining the desired cut off for > interactions. > > Best regards > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Iman Ahmadabadi < > imanahmadabad...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear Gromacs Users, >> >> I need to determine the 2.0 nm for VDW and Coulombic cut offs for my box >> that its height along z direction is too small (for example 2.0 nm) but >> the error will arise for me and I couldn't use the cut off more than 1.0 nm >> because of the box size. What should I do in this regard? >> >> Best, >> >> >> > -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
