Public bug reported:

[Impact]

Currently we are building core18 images using devel (eoan previously,
now focal), but we need to switch to actually using bionic instead (as
focal will be core20). For this to happen, we need bionic to have the
same EXTRA_SNAPS support as we have in eoan as the new custom-image
building solution relies on this feature.

We actually might need to do the same for xenial to enable the same
feature for core16.

[Test Case]

Run a livefs build of core18 using the bionic-proposed (or xenial-
proposed) series and add an EXTRA_SNAPS list of snaps in the metadata
override (e.g. "hello-world"). Check the logs to see if the extra snaps
have been pulled into the image.

[Regression Potential]

Basically none. The only regression potential I can think of is by this
change being wrongly backported and somehow causing ubuntu-core builds
to fail or incorrectly pass additional arguments - but we don't actually
rely on that.

** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: Fix Released

** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Xenial)
     Importance: Undecided
     Assignee: Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100)
         Status: New

** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Bionic)
     Importance: Undecided
     Assignee: Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100)
         Status: New

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
  Currently we are building core18 images using devel (eoan previously,
  now focal), but we need to switch to actually using bionic instead (as
  focal will be core20). For this to happen, we need bionic to have the
  same EXTRA_SNAPS support as we have in eoan as the new custom-image
  building solution relies on this feature.
  
+ We actually might need to do the same for xenial to enable the same
+ feature for core16.
+ 
  [Test Case]
  
- Run a livefs build of core18 using the bionic-proposed series and add an
- EXTRA_SNAPS list of snaps in the metadata override (e.g. "hello-world").
- Check the logs to see if the extra snaps have been pulled into the
- image.
+ Run a livefs build of core18 using the bionic-proposed (or xenial-
+ proposed) series and add an EXTRA_SNAPS list of snaps in the metadata
+ override (e.g. "hello-world"). Check the logs to see if the extra snaps
+ have been pulled into the image.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  
  Basically none. The only regression potential I can think of is by this
  change being wrongly backported and somehow causing ubuntu-core builds
  to fail or incorrectly pass additional arguments - but we don't actually
  rely on that.

** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Xenial)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100)

** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Bionic)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of नेपाली
भाषा समायोजकहरुको समूह, which is subscribed to Xenial.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu 16.04 Bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849491

Title:
  Add support for EXTRA_SNAPS in bionic

Status in livecd-rootfs package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in livecd-rootfs source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in livecd-rootfs source package in Bionic:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Currently we are building core18 images using devel (eoan previously,
  now focal), but we need to switch to actually using bionic instead (as
  focal will be core20). For this to happen, we need bionic to have the
  same EXTRA_SNAPS support as we have in eoan as the new custom-image
  building solution relies on this feature.

  We actually might need to do the same for xenial to enable the same
  feature for core16.

  [Test Case]

  Run a livefs build of core18 using the bionic-proposed (or xenial-
  proposed) series and add an EXTRA_SNAPS list of snaps in the metadata
  override (e.g. "hello-world"). Check the logs to see if the extra
  snaps have been pulled into the image.

  [Regression Potential]

  Basically none. The only regression potential I can think of is by
  this change being wrongly backported and somehow causing ubuntu-core
  builds to fail or incorrectly pass additional arguments - but we don't
  actually rely on that.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1849491/+subscriptions

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~group.of.nepali.translators
Post to     : group.of.nepali.translators@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~group.of.nepali.translators
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to