we did not have had sufficient time to discuss during [EMAIL PROTECTED] the operational issues related to the deployment scenario of LISP. i would have appreciated to discuss the following points together with the operational community:
a) CE-based vs PE-based xTR -> LISP makes use of the former what is the operational impact ? is deployability becoming easier vs operational constraints ? b) Can operational community afford a one time renumbering (EID) assumption considered by LISP/is it a realistic assumption ? or is the alternative consisting in reconnecting sites so as to result into a EID contiguity a possible/feasible scenario ? c) LISP-ALT relies on BGP-based overlay mapping system (EID-to-RLOC) -> as LISP is CE-based isolation from CE instabilities would now impact the mapping system (note: about 80% of the instabilities result from failure events on eBGP links and proportionally such events resulting into BGP instability increases towards the edges). this would result into the same convergence time issue than actually experienced by the current BGP RS (note: the number of TR is proportional to the number of customer sites) ? -- opinions/thoughts ? -- thanks, -d. _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
