On 13/11/2008, at 11:16 AM, John G. Scudder wrote:

GROW folks,

I'll be presenting draft-scudder-bmp-01 ("BGP Monitoring Protocol") at the meeting in Minneapolis. Long-time GROW fans may remember that the WG requested to make the -00 version a WG document way back in 2005. It turned out that there were some major implementation hurdles with the draft as written and it became moribund and never did get issued as draft-ietf-grow.

Fast forward to present, there's been significant renewed interest so we've dusted off the draft and modified the mechanism to make it more implementor-friendly. I'm hoping that the WG would still, after the long hiatus, like to adopt the draft.

Since I missed the submission cutoff, a copy of the draft is attached for those who'd like to (please!) look at it before the meeting. Your comments are welcome before, during or after the meeting.

AS the then-chair of the GROW WG that was requesting submission of this draft as a WG document way back then, I'm really glad to see that its finally seeing the light of day once more as its a potentially very useful BGP monitoring tool. So I support this draft being adopted as a WG document - its a potentially very useful mechanism.

I'm a little confused however by some of the details. It appears that BMP is a method to tap into a peer session and the local BGP speaker can be configured to send a copy of all received updates from a BGP peer to a monitor point using BMP, including the time when these updates were received by the local BGP speaker.

However in section 3 the text states: "If there are state changes in the interim for that prefix, it is acceptable that the router generate the final state of that prefix to the monitoring station. "

What I'm confused about is: what timestamp should be used in such a case? And does this "final state" reflect the final state in the logical Adj-RIB-In for this BGP peer, or the final state according to the local Loc-RIB?

thanks,

    Geoff





_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to