On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote: > The title of the draft explicitly states "operational experience with cache > based mapping". Can you please help me with that? I would think that as > far as such mappings are concerned there are really only two groups of > people who have any: LISPers and HIPsters.
Hi Eliot, I think we have a disconnect here. Is the gentleman who asked the original question around? Would you mind clarifying your question? What kind of operational experience are you interested in? Do you want to know what early-stage proposals have encountered in their experimental settings? As Eliot points out, most of the ideas from RRG are in the pre-engineering research phase. In many cases there is no protocol, let alone operational data about it. As you might expect for the IRTF, the RRG task is determining the universe of possible solutions and sorting out which of the ideas are promising enough to merit deploying engineering resources in IETF working groups. Or do you want to know what behavior we've observed in major, deployed pull-cache systems in the past? We should be able to offer reliable answers to this question, but they'll be less directly relevant to the routing domain. To my knowledge, the routing domain has not previously seen the successful deployment and use of a pull-cache system. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
