On 29/07/10 11:39 PM, "John Scudder" <[email protected]> wrote:
> By the way Terry asked what kind of type code to ask for. The MRT draft sez:
>
> 6.1. Type Codes
>
> Type Codes have a range from 0 to 65535, of which 1-64 have been
> allocated. New Type Codes MUST be allocated starting at 65. Type
> Codes 65 - 511 are to be assigned by IETF Review. Type Codes 512 -
> 2047 are assigned based on Specification Required. Type Codes 2048 -
> 64511 are available on a First Come First Served policy. Type Codes
> 64512 - 65534 are available for Experimental Use. The Type Code
> Values of 0 and 65535 are reserved.
>
> I can't quite imagine why you'd bother with the hoop-jumping required by IETF
> Review. If I were you, I'd probably just use an FCFS code point. Numbers is
> numbers after all, they all work the same.
That is what I was heading for :-)
But wanted to give the WG an option of doing ietf review if so desired.
Moving from my current code of using 65 to a FCFS is trivial.
Happy to go there as soon as the IANA registry is open.
Cheers
Terry
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
