Hi,
I support the working group adoption for this draft, not only because it
is a technically good document, but also because I am part of a group
that directly uses and depends in it.
NIC.br has nowadays 12 operational and isolated locations of IXP in
Brazil with two route servers on each location for redundancy. We have
plans to at least double the number of locations in a near future and we
are looking for new route servers implementations.
PTTMetro Operational Site (in Portuguese)
http://ptt.br/
PTTMetro Presentation (English)
http://lacnic.net/documentos/lacnicxiii/presentaciones/napla2010/0305-lacnicxii-napla-brazil-ixp.pdf
Thanks,
--
Eduardo Ascenço Reis
NIC.br - http://nic.br/
2010/7/29 Christopher Morrow <[email protected]>:
Could there be 14 days of discussion on the subject document pls. The
room in Maastricht was 'overwelmingly positive' to accept this as a WG
document. Please conclude the discussion by Aug 12 2010.
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
