Hmmmmm......does silence on the confirmation of silence=consent mean we have confirmation that silence=consent?????
May I propose that we assume that there is consent and move ahead with the RFC request? Then if anybody *really* objects, this will flush them out. PF From: "Peter Schoenmaker" <[email protected]> To: "'Paul Francis'" <[email protected]>, "'Christopher Morrow'" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Date: 08/23/2010 11:04 PM Subject: RE: [GROW] Call for WG LC - draft-ietf-grow-va-02 && draft-ietf-grow-simple-va-00 Hi, I would like to solicit comments from people about this last call. Can people comment on the list confirming (or denying,) that they believe these drafts are ready for last call to be closed? In the last few ietf meetings there haven't been too many comments. I would like to confirm that silence is consent. peter > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Paul Francis > Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 5:31 AM > To: Christopher Morrow > Cc: [email protected] [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [GROW] Call for WG LC - draft-ietf-grow-va-02 && draft-ietf- > grow-simple-va-00 > > Sorry to have dropped the ball on this. > > I hear from Xiaohu that indeed huawei has IPR on draft-ietf-grow-va-02. > > I can't imagine what it is, since the basic idea was published quite some time > ago, but there it is. > > I don't get the feeling people are much bothered by this, so perhaps we can > close off the last call in a few days? > > In any event, the draft expires in a little over a week (not that this should > much matter in terms of closing the last call). > > Thanks all, > > PF > > > > > From: Christopher Morrow <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected] [email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: 08/01/2010 05:19 AM > Subject: Re: [GROW] Call for WG LC - draft-ietf-grow-va-02 && > draft-ietf-grow-simple-va-00 > Sent by: [email protected] > > > > Apparently while typing I chose the stock subject... WG LC not WC Adoption. > Apologies, and thanks to the anonymous caller who pointed this mistake out. > > -chris > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Christopher Morrow > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please take the next 14 days to discuss WG LC for the subject drafts. > > Expected discussion closure: Aug 12 2010. > > > > -chris > > co-chair > > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
