On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:28:05PM -0800, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On 24 Feb 2011, at 5:06, Joe Provo wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 01:36:00PM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Leo Vegoda <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have updated this document to incorporate improvements suggested by
> >>> Carlos Pignataro.
> >>
> >> terrific, thanks!
> >>
> >> So, are there any more comments from folk, or should we decide now if
> >> GROW should take this draft up?
> >
> > Minor nit: "224.0.0.0/4" listed in section 4 steps on the GLOP 233/8,
> > specifically intended for inter-provider traffic, and as such fail the
> > "should never be routed across the Internet" test.
>
> It was my understanding that MBGP peerings use unicast addresses
> and that the multicast addresses themselves are not announced in
> the "global routing table". That being said, I will defer to those
> with more multicast experience that me.
No - that is accurate, just the wording threw me. Sorry for the blip.
--
RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
