So what is the rule to make it applicable? If there is no second path, When does the 2nd best RR plane advertise the best and when does it advertise nothing?
-- Jakob Heitz. > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Raszuk [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 1:54 PM > To: Jakob Heitz > Cc: IETF IDR; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Idr] [GROW] Potential route flap with bgp-diverse-path > > > > In the previous email, you said the exact opposite: > > "Yes it would advertise overall best if backup is missing." > > That is true but this is not applicable to the case here. > > Here RRs as you have indicated would have P1, P2 and P3 and > when P1 goes > down there is backup on both RRs. > > Thx, > R. > > > >>> If every RR plane must send a path, then the clients > >>> will have N paths for every destination, even if there > >>> is only one path. > >> > >> Nope that is not a requirement as discussed in the previous email. > > > > In the previous email, you said the exact opposite: > > "Yes it would advertise overall best if backup is missing." > > > > You require that to stop the flap. > > > >> > >> > Please make a recommendation on how many RR planes > >> > are optimal. > >> > >> For all applications of today I see 2 as sufficient and optimal. > >> > >> Thx, > >> R. > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Given N RR planes, > >>> that means clients will need N times the BGP memory > >>> and N times the BGP processing power for destinations > >>> with only one path. > >>> > >>> Please make a recommendation on how many RR planes > >>> are optimal. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Jakob Heitz. > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Idr mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr > > > > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
