Given the discussion in IDR yesterday and in GROW today, it seems that the room temperature pushed to adoption the survey work and potential default's change discussion to GROW. Could we get some discussion on-list about this, draft: draft-shishio-grow-isp-rfd-implement-survey-01
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shishio-grow-isp-rfd-implement-survey-01> "BGP Route Flap Damping [RFC2439] is a mechanism that targets route stability. It penalyzes routes that flap with the aim of reducing CPU load on the routers. But it has side-effects. Thus, in 2006, RIPE recommended not to use Route Flap Damping (see RIPE-378). Now, some researchers propose to turn RFD, with less aggressive parameters, back on [draft-ymbk-rfd-usable]. This document describes results of a survey conducted amoung service provider on their use of BGP Route Flap Damping." Again, with the goal to pick up the draft as a WG Item, and end up feeding Route Flap Dampening defaults back into vendor implementations. Thanks! -Chris grow-co-chair _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
