Hi Ricardo, All three RFC 1918 blocks are listed in section 4. Do you believe they need additional explanatory text?
Thanks, Leo -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ricardo Patara Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 7:05 AM To: George, Wesley Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action:draft-ietf-grow-no-more-unallocated-slash8s-01.txt Rereading the draft, I notice there is no mention to 192.168/16 (10/8 and 172.16/12 are there). Any specific reason? Regards, Ricardo Em 27/05/2011, às 09:27, George, Wesley escreveu: > The only additional comment I have is that there may be one more > non-IANA-reserved unrouted space to add to the list. > > ARIN AC has recommended that the ARIN board adopt the policy (2011-5) > reserving a /10 to be used as shared address space (specifically for internal > NAT pools in a CGN application). We might want to recommend filtering that. > > However, I don't want to delay the draft from going through the process while > they sort this out, because ARIN still needs to work with IESG to sort out > how they do this, since normally number reservations come from IETF -> IANA. > You'd have to reach out to Curran to see if they have an idea of what block > they're going to reserve (assuming there are no additional roadblocks) so > that you can document it in this draft. If he doesn't know the specific > block, he may at least be able to give you a pointer to where they are going > to document what it is once it's formally reserved - I assume they'll make it > fairly clear on the ARIN website. > > Wes George > > P.S. - Please, PLEASE don't turn this into a discussion on the merits of the > ARIN proposal or CGN. I'm just the messenger. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Christopher Morrow > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 2:24 PM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D > Action:draft-ietf-grow-no-more-unallocated-slash8s-01.txt > > Grow-Folk, > Leo rev'd the doc with some changes to hopefully meet comments > received, if the commenters could verify that their needs are met I > think we can ask for a short (1wk?) WGLC run and seeing no other > dissent move this along to the IESG. > > have a read and a look at the diff: > <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/grow/draft-ietf-grow-no-more-unallocated-slash8s/draft-ietf-grow-no-more-unallocated-slash8s-01-from-00.diff.html> > > if you please. > > -Chris > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:15 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Global Routing Operations Working Group of >> the IETF. >> >> >> Title : Time to Remove Filters for Previously Unallocated >> IPv4 /8s >> Author(s) : L. Vegoda >> Filename : draft-ietf-grow-no-more-unallocated-slash8s-01.txt >> Pages : 6 >> Date : 2011-05-12 >> >> It has been common for network administrators to filter IP traffic >> from and BGP prefixes of unallocated IPv4 address space. Now that >> there are no longer any unallocated IPv4 /8s, this practise is more >> complicated, fragile and expensive. Network administrators are >> advised to remove filters based on the registration status of the >> address space. >> >> This document explains why any remaining packet and BGP prefix >> filters for unallocated IPv4 /8s should now be removed on border >> routers and documents those IPv4 unicast prefixes that should not be >> routed across the public Internet. >> >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-grow-no-more-unallocated-slash8s-01.txt >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader >> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the >> Internet-Draft. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> GROW mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow >> >> > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > > This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable > proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to > copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for > the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not > the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the > contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be > unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender > immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail > and any printout. > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
