from the draft in question: " We limit the scope of this internet draft to the prevention of origin and sub-prefix hijacks -- a capability that can be implemented and deployed in a reasonable time frame."
I think SIDR has completed its work on this item. This looks to me like a fresh set of eyes on the problem. I'd be willing, if there is time on the grow agenda, to listen to what the authors are proposing and then reflect on the GROW v SIDR question. You may be right - it may be a SIDR item. But given the SIDR space right now seems to be focused on the interaction with and between routers I'm not sure presenting it in SIDR will be be good for either SIDR or the Authors. .. just saying is all.. Cheers Terry On 6/03/12 11:48 AM, "Ronald Bonica" <[email protected]> wrote: > Is it attempting to solve a problem which is also being worked in SIDR? > > Ron > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Terry Manderson [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 8:38 PM >> To: Christopher Morrow; Ronald Bonica >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [GROW] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gersch- >> grow-revdns-bgp-00.txt >> >> From my reading of the SIDR charter: >> >> " Building upon the already completed and implemented framework: >> >> * Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) >> * Distribution of RPKI data to routing devices and its use in >> operational networks >> * Document the use of certification objects within the secure routing >> architecture " >> >> I didn't see any RPKI use mentioned in revdns-bgp. >> >> So my guess is that if you went to present this at SIDR, most SIDR folk >> would say "it doesn't use RPKI" this is not the place. Irrespective of >> how flexible the chairs implement the charter under the allowances of >> the responsible AD. >> >> Cheers. >> T. >> >> >> On 6/03/12 11:31 AM, "Christopher Morrow" >> <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Ronald Bonica <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> Chris, >>>> >>>> This draft appears to be operating in the same area as the origin >>>> authentication work that is currently progressing in SIDR. Shouldn't >>>> all of that work be in one place? >>>> >>>> My guess is that it belongs in SIDR. >>> >>> also was my guess, just looking for consensus on that I believe I >> was. >>> >>> -chris >>> >>>> Ron >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf >>>>> Of Christopher Morrow >>>>> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 4:22 PM >>>>> To: Joseph Gersch >>>>> Cc: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [GROW] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gersch- >>>>> grow-revdns-bgp-00.txt >>>>> >>>>> It would be helpful to the chairs (at least) to get a sense of the >>>>> 'room' (list) on this topic, it seems that the focus is really on a >>>>> dnsops sort of paper, though interaction could be had in the >> routing >>>>> space as well (or that's an intent of the draft's work). >>>>> >>>>> It's not clear that GROW is the place for this work, but keeping >>>>> folks informed isn't a bad plan either (I think). >>>>> >>>>> -chris >>>>> (co-chair) >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Joseph Gersch >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> All, >>>>>> we have submitted a new draft that we would like to present at >>>>>> the Paris IETF meeting. >>>>>> Please take the time to send any comments and suggestions >> regarding >>>>>> this idea on using records in the reverse DNS to help secure BGP >>>>> route origins. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> - Joe Gersch, Dan Massey, Eric Osterweil and Lixia Zhang >>>>>> >>>>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>>>> >>>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: New Version Notification for >>>>>> draft-gersch-grow-revdns-bgp-00.txt >>>>>> Date: February 28, 2012 1:51:59 PM MST >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Cc: [email protected], [email protected], >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> A new version of I-D, draft-gersch-grow-revdns-bgp-00.txt has been >>>>>> successfully submitted by Joe Gersch and posted to the IETF >>>>> repository. >>>>>> >>>>>> Filename: draft-gersch-grow-revdns-bgp >>>>>> Revision: 00 >>>>>> Title: DNS Resource Records for BGP Routing Data Creation date: >>>>>> 2012-02-29 WG ID: Individual Submission Number of pages: 22 >>>>>> >>>>>> Abstract: >>>>>> This draft proposes the creation of two DNS record types for >>>>> storing >>>>>> BGP routing information in the reverse DNS. The RLOCK record >>>>> allows >>>>>> prefix owners to indicate whether the DNS is being used to >>>>>> publish >>>>>> routing data. The SRO record allows operators to indicate >>>>>> whether an >>>>>> IPv4 or IPv6 prefix ought to appear in global routing tables and >>>>>> identifies authorized origin Autonomous System Number(s) for >> that >>>>>> prefix. The published data can be used in a variety of contexts >>>>> and >>>>>> can be extended to include additional information. This work is >>>>>> part >>>>>> of an on-going effort and is accessible in an active testbed. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The IETF Secretariat >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Joseph Gersch >>>>>> Chief Operating Officer >>>>>> Secure64 Software Corporation >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> GROW mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> GROW mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow >>> _______________________________________________ >>> GROW mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
