Hi Wes, That draft (in GROW) is mostly for IPv4 network, not for IPv6 network.
Nonetheless, you have a point. Cheers Rajiv > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of George, Wes > Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 2:34 PM > To: Chuck Anderson; [email protected]; AnthonyKirkham > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Draft: Using Only Link-Local Address in Network > Core > > The proposed comparison already pretty much exists within a draft written > and being adopted in GROW. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores-02 > > > I'm thinking that perhaps the authors of the two drafts need to get together > and either bolster the discussion around IPv6 and link-local in the current > Kirkham draft, or turn this new draft into a companion document to -kirkham > so that we end up with two non-overlapping drafts, one that covers IPv4 and > one that covers IPv6 with a similar format. > > Thanks, > > Wes George > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of > > Chuck Anderson > > Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:37 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Draft: Using Only Link-Local Address in Network > Core > > > > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-behringer-lla-only-00 > > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 06:30:38PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > > > > > Abstract > > > > > > > > > > This document proposes to use only IPv6 link-local addresses on > > > > > infrastructure links between routers, wherever possible. It > > > > > discusses the advantages and disadvantages of this approach to aide > > > > > the decision process for a given network, > > > > > > I'm perfectly fine with that abstract. I just want to be sure that > > > this practice isn't advocated as a BCP to do so (because next thing our > > > customers or some crazy auditors will tell us that we do it all wrong). > > > > Perhaps the draft could be reworked to be a comparison and overview of > > both techniques, LLA and global addressing, and their pros/cons > > without having a position/recommendation/BCP for either method. > > _______________________________________________ > > v6ops mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > > This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable > proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to > copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for > the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the > intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the > contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be > unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender > immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail > and any printout. > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
