nits: - please run: s/it's/its/s on the document.
- "In some protocol's implementations for example BGP loc-RIB can be further...". Change to "For example, in some protocol implementations BGP loc-RIB can be further..." - "Let's illustrate...". Too informal. "We illustrate..." - "Another deploymet consideration" => "Another deployment consideration" - "Therefor under the above intra" => "Therefore under the above intra" Most of the document looks fine. However, there is one content omission, namely that there is no analysis of what happens when a compressed RIB undergoes a topology change which modifies a bunch of next-hops. If this happens, the fib compression can explode with an upper bound of the uncompressed size. This may cause Interesting and Unexpected side effects - e.g. routers falling over due to topology changes and so forth. From an operational point of view, I think this is probably important enough to warrant a mention in the draft. Nick _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
