On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Rob Shakir <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi GROW, > > Following the discussion and comments on and off the list over the last few > weeks, I have made some modifications to some of the discussion within this > draft. > > Particularly, the changes are: > > - As per Wes George's suggestion (and Sue Hares' request), added a statement > that future updates to the BGP specification should define the category of > error, and expected error handling class within which errors in each > attribute fall. > > - Updated the discussion of scaling considerations for both automated > response to semantic errors, and the behaviour during repeated critical > errors, as per the discussion on the GROW list. I think that this captures > the conclusions that were reached, but comments are welcome. > > - Some minor changes to wording and bringing drafts referenced in the > informational references in line with the current drafts (mainly in light of > a number of these drafts being adopted as IDR working group items). > > Chris, Peter - I would like to request that this version of the draft is > submitted for WGLC as I think this addresses all the outstanding comments > both from the Paris meeting, and that I have received via on- and off-list > mail. >
sounds good to me... look for that in a moment. > Many thanks in advance for any comments and/or LC initiation! > > Kind regards, > r. > > On 6 Jun 2012, at 16:04, [email protected] wrote: > >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. This draft is a work item of the Global Routing Operations >> Working Group of the IETF. >> >> Title : Operational Requirements for Enhanced Error Handling >> Behaviour in BGP-4 >> Author(s) : Rob Shakir >> Filename : >> draft-ietf-grow-ops-reqs-for-bgp-error-handling-04.txt >> Pages : 29 >> Date : 2012-06-06 >> >> BGP-4 is utilised as a key intra- and inter-Autonomous System routing >> protocol in modern IP networks. The failure modes as defined by the >> original protocol standards are based on a number of assumptions >> around the impact of session failure. Numerous incidents both in the >> global Internet routing table and within Service Provider networks >> have been caused by strict handling of a single invalid UPDATE >> message causing large-scale failures in one or more Autonomous >> Systems. >> >> This memo describes the current use of BGP-4 within Service Provider >> networks, and outlines a set of requirements for further work to >> enhance the mechanisms available to a BGP-4 implementation when >> erroneous data is detected. Whilst this document does not provide >> specification of any standard, it is intended as an overview of a set >> of enhancements to BGP-4 to improve the protocol's robustness to suit >> its current deployment. >> >> >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-grow-ops-reqs-for-bgp-error-handling-04.txt >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-grow-ops-reqs-for-bgp-error-handling-04.txt >> >> The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-ops-reqs-for-bgp-error-handling/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> GROW mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
