Quick question. To my understanding "overlapping routes" seem to be what most people call more-specific routes (aka. "more-specifics").
In my experience things which are described as overlapping mean that some part of one thing is _partially_ covered by some part of some other thing. I don't see how what's commonly known as a "covering" route in the draft and in current usage is _partially_ covering what's underneath. Am I missing something? If so, why introduce some new terminology? Tony On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Christopher Morrow < [email protected]> wrote: > As per the meeting moments ago, could we discuss adopting this draft: > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-white-grow-overlapping-routes-00> > > as a GROW working group item? Let's call the call on my birthday: > 08/14/2012 or August 14, 2012. > > thanks! > -chris > (co-chair) > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow >
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
