On 03/10/2012 17:10, Russ White wrote: > Because you could see this and mark your /24 not to be bounded (if we > put that back in). We were trying for the simplest solution to > increasing table sizes --I know there are economic reasons the table > sizes are growing, but we need at least some option to de-escalate the > madness at some point.
People have been saying for the last twentysomething years that the sky is falling due to DMZ growth. Geoff Huston gave a talk about this last year in Vienna where he presented some data and analysis: http://ripe63.ripe.net/archives/video/178 http://ripe63.ripe.net/presentations/61-2011-10-31-bgp2011.pdf I'm not suggesting that the DFZ couldn't do with a bit of slimming, but the bgp RIB is not the best place to do it because you're losing too much information too early. Nick _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
