Howdy, this draft did get renamed, but didn't get renamed properly for grow :(
draft-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-00.txt could we re-spin the draft with a name more like: draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-00.txt that way it'll show up in the grow work items list. thanks! On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Christopher Morrow <[email protected]> wrote: > howdy... a few days late, but in the end there was some support for > adopting it, and at least no non-support for it. > > Could the authors spin a re-titled draft and hopefully they are > incorporating comments/etc as well? > > thanks! > -chris > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Christopher Morrow > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Grow Folks, >> the authors of: draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations >> >> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations-01> >> >> have asked if their work is appropriate for the GROW-wg, could we take >> the next 14 days (ending Nov 28, 2012) to think/discuss this draft and >> it's efficacy to work in the GROW arena? The abstract of the draft is: >> "The purpose of this document is to catalog past issues influencing >> the efficacy of Internet Routing Registries (IRR) for inter-domain >> routing policy specification and application in the global routing >> system over the past two decades. Additionally, it provides a >> discussion regarding which of these issues are still problematic in >> practice, and which are simply artifacts that are no longer >> applicable but continue to stifle inter-provider policy-based >> filtering adoption and IRR utility to this day." >> >> Thanks! >> -Chris >> (co-chair) _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
