On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 02:45:23PM -0700, Job Snijders wrote: > Recently I submitted the following internet draft to the IETF for review > and standardization: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snijders-rpsl-via-02 > > The document defines two attributes in the aut-num Class which can be > used in RPSL policy specifications to publish desired routing policy > regarding non-adjacent networks. > > I am struggling a little bit where in the IETF this draft can be > discussed and whether GROW is an appropiate group to further the > development of the document. > > Comments are most welcome!
The original RPS working group is defunct. In such situations, the general WG for the area would tend to pick up such work. However, since GROW has recently picked up route-server work, which this document is targeted for, GROW is probably a reasonable home for it. Having reviewed this document (not in careful detail), the major issue in -00 that was presented at NANOG has since been dealt with: The new feature is present as an attribute of an existing RPSL class rather than trying to alter the behavior of the existing attributes. Per RFC 2622, sec. 10.2, this should meet the requirements for safely extending the language. I would support adopting this draft as a WG document. If it is, I will provide review on it. I do, however, suggest that the WG attempt to explicitly involve reviewers from RIPE, Merit, APNIC or other organizations that operate RPSL repositories since they are the parties most impacted by these changes. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
