On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:23:43PM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote: > Howdy grow folks, > During the meeting on Monday Sriram brought up the topic of asking for > working-group adoption for this draft: > > draft-sriram-route-leak-problem-definition > > The abstract is: > " A systemic vulnerability of the Border Gateway Protocol routing > system, known as 'route leaks', has received significant attention in > recent years. Frequent incidents that result in significant > disruptions to Internet routing are labeled "route leaks", but to > date we have lacked a common definition of the term. In this > document, we provide a working definition of route leaks, keeping in > mind the real occurrences that have received significant attention. > Further, we attempt to enumerate (though not exhaustively) different > types of route leaks based on observed events on the Internet. We > aim to provide a taxonomy that covers several forms of route leaks > that have been observed and are of concern to Internet user community > as well as the network operator community." > > Could we have a 2.5wk (so we don't end mid-week losing half a week to > the meeting) adoption thought/vote/discussion for this draft in GROW, > please?
I was in favor of adoption. Having consistent terminology for the cases, even if nothing else comes out of the document, is useful for trying to address this issue in the long term. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
