I believe we should add a reference to the RPSL+RPKI work here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-06, although work-in-progress it is relevant as an informational reference.
BTW, Section 4.5 of the document would be inaccurate as the process in draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-06 covers not only route[6] objects but also as-block, aut-num and inet[6]num objects. Regards, Roque ‹ Roque Gagliano Tail-f Solutions Architect Southern Europe +41 76 449 8867 On 08/01/15 09:26, "Jari Arkko" <[email protected]> wrote: >Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for >draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-05: Yes > >When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >introductory paragraph, however.) > > >Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > >The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-conside >rations/ > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >COMMENT: >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Thanks for writing an interesting document. > >This reference clearly needs a fix: > > BGP soft-reconfiguration [REF?] > > >_______________________________________________ >GROW mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
