On 3/2/15 6:40 AM, McPherson, Danny wrote: > > These are some pretty significant changes that themselves could be an > internet-draft/document, methinks. Perhaps those so interested in C.I.A > in their comments could contribute some text, this was meant to be more > operational. > > I hope Eric has the cycles to resolve these [non-trivial comments] and if > they did get resolved it¹d surely need to return to WG LC (IMO) ‹ and I¹d > presuppose someone would find an opportunity to request a review from > SIDR, although part of the intent was expressly to avoid beating that > horse.
so, my assumption is a that discussing them isn't going always require change, some of them probably will. > I¹ll defer to Eric if he¹s going to be able to address these, but I can > pretty much guarantee it won¹t see the RFC editor until well after Dallas > (if ever, now). If we can't resolve it under adrian, that's fine more or less becasue the reviewer becomes the new AD but I probably get to rerun the IESG evaluation, so for all our sakes I think that is expedient to clear the discuss under the current regime but I am flexible. > Alas, > > > -danny > > > On 3/2/15, 1:51 AM, "joel jaeggli" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> hello, >> >> would like to chase this one down and resolve it. >> >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg03015.html >> >> but haven't seen to much activity. >> >> lets do this thing and maybe we can publish this one before the upcoming >> meeting. >> >> joel >> >> On 2/9/15 9:08 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: >>> I'm under no illusion that terry's dicussion will have changed by the >>> time he's installed. >>> >>> I would rather have it done sooner in any event. >>> >>> we did not get a change out prior ti the jan discussion and it stalled >>> after that sorry. >>> >>> On 2/9/15 1:06 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Any progress on this? >>>> >>>> Just in case you were holding out the hope that my Discuss will expire >>>> when I leave the IESG, I have to point out that my Discuss was to make >>>> sure that the RTG Dir review by Terry Manderson gets attention. And >>>> Terry will show up on the IESG when I leave :-) >>>> >>>> Shame to see a document sitting when it is so close to being done. >>>> >>>> Adrian >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: iesg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel >>>>> Sent: 18 December 2014 15:33 >>>>> To: The IESG >>>>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; >>>>> [email protected]; >>>>> draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations....@tools.ietf.org >>>>> Subject: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on >>>>> draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy- >>>>> considerations-05: (with DISCUSS) >>>>> >>>>> Adrian Farrel has entered the following ballot position for >>>>> draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-05: Discuss >>>>> >>>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >>>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut >>>>> this >>>>> introductory paragraph, however.) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please refer to >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >>>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >>>>> >>>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-cons >>>>> iderations/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> DISCUSS: >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to see some discussion of the points raised by Terry >>>>> Manderson >>>>> in his Routing Directorate review during the IETF last call period >>>>> (circulated on the Grow list at >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg03015.html). >>>>> >>>>> By preference this discussion should be between the authors, WG, and >>>>> reviewer. But I'd be happy to step in and own the discussions if that >>>>> will help. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
