Rick, Jeff,
>Should there be an additional edits, I'd suggest removing "subprefix" and > consistently using "more specific prefix". Thanks. No problem. I will plan to take care of this change in the next revision along with a few other comments that have been shared recently on the GROW list. Sriram ________________________________ From: Rick Casarez <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:20 PM To: Jeffrey Haas Cc: Sriram, Kotikalapudi; idr wg list; [email protected]; Charles van Niman; Andrei Robachevsky ([email protected]) Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-problem-definition-03.txt I would concur on Jeff's suggestion. Otherwise I like the draft. ------------------- Cheers, Rick Experiences not things. On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:58:26AM +0000, Sriram, Kotikalapudi wrote: > This version (draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-problem-definition-03) > is a significantly revised and updated draft relative to version-02. > The document (version-02) was in WGLC in the GROW WG. > Many thanks to Charles, Jeff, Wes and Andrei for their > review, comments, and support in response to WGLC > in GROW (it was cross posted to IDR as well). > The authors have considered all their comments/suggestions in revising this > draft, > and we feel that it has significantly benefited from their recent > review/re-review. Thanks, Sriram. You've addressed my comments. Should there be an additional edits, I'd suggest removing "subprefix" and consistently using "more specific prefix". -- Jeff _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
