On Nov 4, 2015, at 2:52 PM, John Scudder <[email protected]> wrote: > I think for this draft we should fix the name to clarify what the field > really means, but not try to extend to other types of peers. That ought to be > straightforward enough in an update document if needed.
By the way, this made me realize we actually hadn't defined a registry for Peer Types, oops. I will go ahead and add one, along with one for Peer Flags for good measure. --John _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
