>> tls will satisfy usability, presence in shipping code and likelihood of >> deployment. It comes at the cost of either using a different port number >> or else adding startls into the protocol. It's understandable why there >> would be opposition to implementing this at revision -16 and with code >> widely deployed in the field. But from the point of view of the question >> "where do we want to be a couple of years down the road from now?", it's a >> pile better than ipsec from an operations point of view. > > Just in case it's not clear, I very much agree with the above.
nick is much more eloquent than i. randy _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
