Hi Christopher, thanks for the update.
There are no edits due so please proceed. Best regards, Thomas From: GROW <[email protected]> on behalf of Christopher Morrow <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday 8 June 2016 at 22:47 To: "[email protected] [email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [GROW] WGLC: draft-ietf-grow-blackholing - ENDS May 20, 2016 Howdy folks, time passed, and this discussion ended. I believe in the end there were folk in favor of moving this on to publication request. Thanks for taking the time to read and comment back as appropriate. If there are edits due, could the authors make a rev of the document appear and ping the chairs for the next step(s) (shepherds writeup and email to iesg) On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Christopher Morrow <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Howdy rough and Tumble WG folks: The authors of: draft-ietf-grow-blackholing had asked for WGLC to be started on their document. The abstract is: This document describes the use of a well-known Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) community for blackholing at IP networks and Internet Exchange Points (IXP). This well-known advisory transitive BGP community, namely BLACKHOLE, allows an origin AS to specify that a neighboring IP network or IXP should blackhole a specific IP prefix. The URL to the document: <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00> Please have a read, give it some consideration and send comments/questions/ACK/NACK back so the authors can adjust course or celebrate a process victory over the document snake. -chris co-chair GROW.
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
