Job Snijders wrote: > Follow-up question: without section 3.4 - would you still object?
I don't think that IXPs should be mentioned anywhere in this document. For the general case of blackholing, an IXP is a clearing house so should not get involved in the business of dropping its participants' traffic. In the case of route servers, blackholing turns the IXP into a legal target. Nick _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
