Robert Raszuk wrote:
> ‚ÄčThe problem with 16:16 and now with endorsing 32:32:32 is that it still
> requires an external oracle to manually translate encoded magic number
> into set of actions. 

I'm struggling to understand how and why this is relevant to adopting
large as-is.

Operators are free to choose their own semantics and their own
constructions.  If you feel that it should be otherwise, post a bunch of
drafts to IDR and GROW and let's discuss them.

Nick

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to