Because if we say adopt large as 4:4:4:4 amount of this mapping is reduced.

Or we can adopt as-is then enlarge ...

Thx,
r.

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> wrote:

> Robert Raszuk wrote:
> > ‚ÄčThe problem with 16:16 and now with endorsing 32:32:32 is that it still
> > requires an external oracle to manually translate encoded magic number
> > into set of actions.
>
> I'm struggling to understand how and why this is relevant to adopting
> large as-is.
>
> Operators are free to choose their own semantics and their own
> constructions.  If you feel that it should be otherwise, post a bunch of
> drafts to IDR and GROW and let's discuss them.
>
> Nick
>
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to