On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:12:40AM +0000, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) wrote: > My response marked with [Sriram] below. > > [Gert] Having implementations that could tack arbitrary "RPF lists" to > an interface would be very nice, but this is more like "auto-generate > ACLs based on prefix info" than "RPF" which stands for "reverse path > filter" (not sure about the "filter" bit, though) > > [Sriram] Current Feasible Path uRPF makes use of announced prefixes to > creates RPF tables of permitted source addresses on specific > interfaces, and our enhanced FP uRPF also does the same, but with some > more intelligence built in.
Does this technique make routers self-aware? What exactly is meant with the word 'intelligence' in this context? Kind regards, Job _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
