On Nov 16, Julian Seifert <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with both points. Maybe not use utf8/unicode or reduce to only > alphanumerics? Not supporting UTF-8 is not acceptable for a new IETF protocol and would preclude using it in some cultures.
Customers with really crappy management infrastructure could ask their vendors to implement a knob to report the strings as base64, but I really wonder which real world use cases there are for this. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
