Susan Hares wrote: > This email is to make you aware of the discussion on the Extended > Messages draft (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-21). Do you > want the message size extended for all BGP messages or just UPDATE > messages? This probably is more important if you want to have a > larger size OPEN, ROUTE-REFESH, and UPDATES. The IDR co-chairs > value the operational input from GROW WG.
I don't see any reason an extended message size should be limited to just UPDATEs. Enke's suggestion for handling the single anomalous case (OPEN) looks reasonable. I'd say, go for it! Nick _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
