On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 03:57:08PM +0100, Job Snijders wrote: > > So in my opinion, BGP Session Culling really ought to be the BCP in all > > topologies, not just the ones «where upper layer fast fault detection > > mechanisms are unavailable and the lower layer topology is hidden from > > the BGP speakers». > > > > Another logical consequence of this is that the rather imprecise «a few > > minutes» should ideally be expanded on, taking slow routers such as the > > MX80 into account. While five minutes of culling would be helpful, it > > would not be enough to avoid all disruption. > > I think you make a valid point, would you be willing to prepare a change > proposal to address this? The document's authoritive source is on > github: hxxps://github.com/bgpculling/draft-bgp-session-culling
Sorry, correct URL is https://github.com/bgp/draft-grow-bgp-session-culling _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
