On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 04:41:06PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 03:07:32PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > > On a side note, I'd be interesting to know why reducing the impact > > of the maintenance using gshut is not considered as worth it, while > > it is for culling. Especially since the benefit of the latter is > > 90 second (and configurable) while the former is minutes (and not > > configurable). > > How's the IXP operator going to introduce a gshut message into a BGP > session between IXP customer A and IXP customer B?
an IXP can't, and I am not under the impression that Bruno was suggestion to do so. I took his comments as applicable to section 2.1 this is why the proposed draft contains two angles: one for IXPs and one for ISPs, each with their different nuances. Kind regards, Job _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
