Hi Bruno, [Bruno] The goal was to be able to use gshut even if both EBGP peer are not > enhanced to support it. The benefit of flagging routes with a community is > that gshut may be implemented on vanilla routers using a BGP route > map/policy. >
Sure thing. However peers need to be consistently configured with the same policy to understand the meaning of the community. If you think this is easy - great. > Incremental deployment in a benefit, in particular between > AS/organisations, and in particular on small/low end routers which are not > replaced every 4 years. > Well it is not router replacement .. it is software upgrade. But sure if you can convince peers to setup same error free policy that is perfect. No objections at all :). Best, R.
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
