Grow folks:
Section 2 aligns with the intent of RFC4271. I feel this concise draft address appropriate security considerations. I believe this drafts is ready from a technical viewpoint for publication. I am not an operator of a network, so I cannot comment on operator issues. Sue From: GROW [mailto:grow-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 9:48 PM To: grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org; grow-...@tools.ietf.org; grow-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [GROW] WGLC draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject - ends 3/19/2017 (mar 19) Howdy folks! There were 3 people, 4 if you include me, that had something to say here... it'd be nice if a few more folk had read through and agreed/disagreed :) I'll delay decision making until Tues (3/21/2017)... read and respond pls :) -chris On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Christopher Morrow <christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: Howdy WG folks, This request starts the WGLC for: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject/> with abstract: "This document defines the default behavior of a BGP speaker when there is no import or export policy associated with an External BGP session." please have a read-through, decide if this needs more work and then speak up on list. thanks! -chris co-chair-personage.
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
