Good memory, Joel. I support Joel's recollection and the BMP enhancements in the proposal.
Thanks, Tony On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 10:18 AM, joel jaeggli <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/28/17 7:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > > while i support adoption of this work, two notes: > > > > o i should declare an involvement with the openbmp cabal for which > > this is key > > > > o clue bat please. as this changes what is transported over bmp, why > > is it not in idr? > > 7854 itself was pursued in grow. (eventually, there's a long gap > between 2005 and 2016) > > iirc the rational applied then i think as now is it's monitoring tool > not a routing protocol. > > > > > randy > > > > _______________________________________________ > > GROW mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > >
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
