I've read the I-D, I support the idea, given that the inverse (validated
IRR-derived/RPSL from RPKI) is more problematic. I suspect this may be
a slippery slope into reconstituting IRRs in RPKI but if I must be stuck
with RPKI why not...
-danny
On 2018-05-21 11:08 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
howdy GROW-WG denizens,
please have a read through:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ss-grow-rpki-as-cones/
Abstract:
"This document describes a way to define groups of Autonomous System
numbers in RPKI [RFC6480]. We call them AS-Cones. AS-Cones
provide
a mechanism to be used by operators for filtering BGP-4 [RFC4271]
announcements."
and discuss applicability to the GROW-WG, and whether or not this
document
is a work item we'd like to pick up and march forward.
thanks!
-chris
co-chair
ps: job sort of did ask this same question... so either on this thread
or
the original:
Subject: [GROW] draft-ss-grow-rpki-as-cones-00
is a fine place to comment.
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
