Qing, On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:28:30AM -0700, Qing Yang wrote: > Points well taken... NLRIs will be an improvement in terminology over > prefixes, too? > > And yes, type 8 as it is worded today, is the reason that I think one > cannot derive the number of prefixes rejected by inbound policy from type 7 > and 8. So I definitely agree with you that an update to RFC7584 would be > helpful.
A trivial Internet-Draft, at least once draft-scudder-grow-bmp-registries-change has gone through. My suggestion is to gather a list of stats you might want and kick off the draft. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
