Chris, >Please send along agenda requests as time permits... We are planning to meet >in Bangkok, unless no one can find agenda topics? :)
If possible to accommodate, I would like to request 10 to 15 minutes. We have this updated WG draft in IDR on route leaks detection and mitigation. There is a shift towards using BGP Community (previously it was BGP Attribute) for carrying the Route Leak Protection (RLP) information. The thinking behind this is potentially quicker deployment without dependence on vendor implementation changes. It will be good to discuss this in GROW and get operator inputs on the type of Community (transitive) that might be best suited (Large, Extended, etc.). Updated IDR WG draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation-10 Authors’ Team Discussion Slides provide helpful graphics and scenario analyses: https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2018/10/22/rlp_using_bgp_community-v4.pdf Sriram _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
