Hi Jeff, Best route for sure, unless add-paths is used. I would like to understand your use-case more... When you mention the customer has to use "parallel BGP sessions for active route state," are you saying that the customer needs to establish multiple "monitoring" BGP peering sessions in order to obtain what would have been available via BMP Adj-RIB-In Post Policy monitoring?
Thanks, Tim On 11/16/18, 1:26 AM, "GROW on behalf of Zhuangshunwan" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: I do wish to get this point resolved. We have inconsistent pressure from our own customer base as to whether they want to monitor best bgp vs. "please give me something to let me stop needing parallel BGP sessions for active route state". [Shunwan] IMO, Section 5.2 of draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-02 describe a method to send best ecmp group to BMP Station. BMP client can signal add-paths capability to BMP Station via BMP Peer UP message, then BMP Station will know that the client will send multiple NLRI for one destination. That is my understanding. Per my limited knowledge about BMP, I don't understand why we need "parallel BGP sessions for active route state", Sorry. Can you explain it in detail? _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
