NOTE: Sorry for the delay... end of year commitments are pressing... Addressing 
these comments in descending order. 

See inline marked [tievens]


On 12/11/18, 1:05 PM, "GROW on behalf of Jeffrey Haas" <[email protected] 
on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

    Authors,
    
    In section 4.1, we define a new peer type to cover the loc-rib.  This is
    mostly a pointer to section 4.2 of RFC 7854.
    
    
          0                   1                   2                   3
          0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
         +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
         |   Peer Type   |  Peer Flags   |
         +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
         |         Peer Distinguisher (present based on peer type)       |
         |                                                               |
         +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
         |                 Peer Address (16 bytes)                       |
         ~                                                               ~
         +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
         |                           Peer AS                             |
         +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
         |                         Peer BGP ID                           |
         +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
         |                    Timestamp (seconds)                        |
         +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
         |                  Timestamp (microseconds)                     |
         +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    
    My question is with regards to Peer AS and Peer BGP ID:
    
    If either of those fields are altered on the router, what is the expected
    behavior in BMP?
    
    I have opinions, but would like to see yours. :-)

[tievens] Per this draft, the BGP-ID and ASN are set to the global/default 
value or based on VRF (Local-RIB it conveys).   The simple answer is if you 
change distinguishing (peer identity) values in the per-peer-header, you will 
need to send a PEER DOWN (using old values) and PEER UP (using new values). 
Regardless of this draft, if you send a new per-peer header with different 
values (sans type, flags, and timestamps), the receiver is likely going to 
treat that as a different peer. We/OpenBMP, and I believe others, use peer rd, 
peer addr, peer asn, and peer id as distinguishing identify for a peer, which 
enables us to multiplex different peers over the same TCP (bmp) stream. 



    
    -- Jeff
    
    _______________________________________________
    GROW mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
    

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to