> Section 4.1: > > s/is not really on IANA's list/is not individually named on IANA's > list/
more correctly, i think not receive special treatment in Cisco IOS XR, and at least one specific community on Cisco IOS XR's special treatment list (internet == 0:0) is not formally a Well-Known Community as it is not in [IANA-WKC]; but taken from the "Reserved" range [0x00000000-0x0000FFFF]. > Section 5: > > I'm not sure what the '>' character indicates. a klutz at the keyboard > Section 6: > > "Vendors SHOULD clearly document the behavior of "set" directive in > their implementations." I'm not sure normative language makes sense > here (otherwise, what is the rationale for not using MUST?). in a vain hope of reciprocity, ops folk are hesitant to tell vendors MUST unless something will actually break. will consult with co-authors. my guess of outcome is MUST; but i am not a great guesser. thanks for review! randy _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
