ok great! also.. yikes! :) I'll read/review/send mail about this tonight :)
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:32 PM Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > > Chris, > > While past the poll closure, I've read and support adoption of the draft. > > (And ideally, quick review cycle over IETF 105 and subsequent publication.) > > -- Jeff > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:13:45PM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > Howdy GROW folks, > > During the last meeting (or really the Thailand meeting) I believe > > John asked for a WG Adoption call for the draft named: > > draft-scudder-grow-bmp-peer-up > > > > Abstract of which is: > > " RFC 7854, BMP, uses different message types for different purposes. > > > > Most of these are Type, Length, Value (TLV) structured. One message > > type, the Peer Up message, lacks a set of TLVs defined for its use, > > instead sharing a namespace with the Initiation message. Subsequent > > experience has shown that this namespace sharing was a mistake, as it > > hampers the extension of the protocol. > > > > This document updates RFC 7854 by creating an independent namespace > > for the Peer Up message. The changes in this document are formal > > only, compliant implementations of RFC 7854 also comply with this > > specification." > > > > Let's have a read/review/comment and decide to Adopt this draft as a > > WG Item, or conversely decide to not Adopt this draft. > > > > Polls close 06-11-2019 > > > > Thanks! > > -chris > > > > _______________________________________________ > > GROW mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
