On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 01:21:04AM +0000, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) wrote: > In response to Robert's point on the IDR list related to > draft-uttaro-idr-bgp-persistence: If BGP session terminates > unexpectedly - say when max prefix is reached - it is quite unclear on > the operational consequences of such duet of features enabled > together. > > may I suggest that response to the outbound maximum prefix exceeded > event should be a hard CEASE as defined in > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8538. It already suggests to use a hard > CEASE for an inbound maximum prefix exceeded event. > > Robert, will that satisfy your concern with persistence?
While the question is addressed to Robert, I think this is a good idea and am happy to incorporate text in the maxprefix Internet-Draft that references the rfc8538 hard reset concept. Kind regards, Job _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
