Dear Tim, Hi Tim,
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 05:49:48PM +0000, Tim Evens (tievens) wrote: > [tievens] Agree. The draft itself has local in the name. Does it make > sense to change the draft name or keep it as is? The filename is not relevant, I'd leave it as-is. Ultimately the document will have an RFC number as filename anyway. > [tievens] That works, but it's really the only method right now... hence > current... it becomes > alternative with this draft. ( Changed to alternative. Thanks. At this stage of the document's lifecycle it sometimes is helpful to assume a writing style 'as if the document has been published'. :-) Thank you for the changes! Can you upload a new revision next week? Kind regards, Job _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
