Grow:
In the past you requested the IDR WG to consider drafts on prefix limits.
Two drafts proposed included discussions on prefix limits
(draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-02.txt,
draft-sas-idr-maxprefix-inbound-04.txt)
Would you query the grow working group regarding:
a) hard prefix limits per BGP peer
a) (protocol enforced) maximum prefix (inbound)
b) (software enforced) maximum prefix (inbound)
c) (software enforced) maximum prefix (outbound)
b) thresholds prior to hard limits per BGP peer
c) What limits should be placed on VPNs?
What granularity
Do you think you could get an answer for IDR by
the end of IETF 113?
If you wish, I can also present the request at Grow at IETF 113.
5 minutes (what I need + why)
10 discussion (when I listen to operations experts)
Sue Hares
(idr co-chair)
--------------------
Drafts mentioned
Draft 1: draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-02.txt
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf/
Note: ORF mechanism not approved, but prefix limits discussion is useful:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Lt5IQVUNPxhEh8-xvRTDIJZ24Kk/
New definitions: Weak-PE, rogue-PE
Draft 2: draft-sas-idr-maxprefix-inbound-04.txt
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sas-idr-maxprefix-inbound/
(in IPR call prior to adoption)
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
